Abstract:
Ideally, teachers should work in stress-free environments to effectively fulfill their
teaching roles. However, they often face various challenges while carrying out their
responsibilities. These challenges include but not limited to; heavy workloads,
expected students’ academic performance by school administrators’, student
indiscipline, school geographical location, and inadequate school physical facilities.
These difficulties contribute significantly to teacher burnout, resulting in problems
like increased absenteeism, substance abuse, missed deadlines, and related issues in
Kenyan public secondary schools. This research aimed at investigating the influence
of school contextual predictors on teacher burnout in public secondary schools in
Tharaka Nithi County. Specifically, it examined the influence of workload, expected
students’ academic performance by school administrators, student indiscipline, school
geographical location, and school physical facilities on teacher burnout in public
secondary schools within this county. The research employed a descriptive survey
design, guided by the Multi-Dimensional Theory of Burnout and Golembiewski and
Munzenrider's burnout model. The study involved 154 principals, 2,383 teachers, 25
Teachers Service Commission (TSC) and 7 Quality Assurance and Standards Officers
(QASOs) in Tharaka Nithi County. The sample size consisted of 343 teachers, 46
principals, all 25 TSC and 7 QASO officers, selected through a combination of
sampling techniques, including two-stage cluster random sampling, purposive
sampling, and simple random sampling. Data collection methods included
questionnaires for teachers, interview schedules for principals, TSC, and QASO
officers, as well as data collection forms for secondary sources and field observations.
The reliability of the questionnaires was confirmed using Cronbach's alpha
coefficient, which yielded values between 0.76 and 0.87, indicating good reliability at
0.7. Data analysis involved both descriptive and inferential statistics in line with the
study objectives. Descriptive analysis was used to analyze quantitative data from
questionnaires, including frequencies, percentages, means, and standard deviations.
Qualitative data from open-ended questions, interview schedules, and secondary data
transcripts were analyzed using content analysis. The null hypotheses were tested
using Pearson moment correlation and Multiple Regression at a significance level of
0.05, with Statistical Package for Social Studies (SPSS) facilitating data analysis. The
study's findings revealed, all the independent variables had statistically significant
relationships with teacher burnout, as supported by significant t-tests for workload
(t=4.364, p<0.05), expected student academic performance by school administrators’
(t=4.876, p<0.05), student indiscipline (t=-5.981, p<0.05), school geographical
location (t=11.150, p<0.05), and school physical facilities (t=3.514, p<0.05). In
conclusion, the study established, these school contextual predictors indeed,
influenced teacher burnout, emphasizing the need for focused attention. To address
these challenges, recommendations included, equitable teacher distribution, to
alleviate workload, school strategies to improve student academic performance,
interventions to address student indiscipline, and government investments in adequate
learning facilities, housing, and social amenities, particularly in remote areas. Further
research was recommended to explore the influence of these variables on burnout
among teachers and lecturers in higher education institutions, as well as conducting
longitudinal studies. The study's primary beneficiaries are teachers, principals, TSC
and QASOs officers.